Best 1TB PCIe 3.0 TLC DRAM-less SSDs
There are 26 1TB PCIe 3.0 TLC DRAM-less SSDs compared here. The fastest is the Samsung 980 at 3500 MB/s read at 1TB, and the highest-rated for endurance is the Gigabyte NVMe SSD (1600 TBW). Sequential reads across the group span 1550–3500 MB/s at 1TB.
Why this configuration
A 1TB PCIe 3.0 TLC DRAM-less SSD is an affordable NVMe step up from SATA. Gen3 is roughly six times SATA's throughput yet often costs little more, making it the easy default for a first NVMe drive or a laptop that only supports Gen3.
1TB is the capacity most single-drive builds settle on.
Usually chosen for: budget builders, laptop upgraders and anyone leaving SATA behind.
Good fit: everyday all-rounder use, from OS drive to game library; value builds and gaming where cost per gigabyte matters.
Look elsewhere for: databases, virtual machines and other sustained random-write workloads.
Ranked list
The top 20 of 26 are listed. The full SSD catalogue filters on every spec.
Speeds on this page are the manufacturer's 1TB ratings where published (25 of 26 drives), not the family headline figure. 1 of the 26 are rated slower at 1TB than at their fastest capacity. Rated writes at 1TB run 950–3750 MB/s.
| # | Model | Tier | Controller | Read MB/s (at 1TB) | TBW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Samsung 980 250GB, 500GB, 1TB | Mid-range | SAMSUNG PABLO "S4LR033" CONTROLLER | 3500 | 600 | Find on Amazon |
| 2 | Intel ® SSD 760P SERIES 128GB, 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB | Mid-range | Silicon Motion SM2262G (2-Core 575 | 3230 | 576 | Find on Amazon |
| 3 | ADATA FALCON 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB | Mid-range | Realtek RTS5762DL (Dual Core, 8-Ch | 3100 | 1200 | Find on Amazon |
| 4 | Mushkin HELIX-L 250GB, 500GB, 1TB | Mid-range | Silicon Motion SM2263XT | 2110 | 600 | Find on Amazon |
| 5 | Mid-range | Phison PS5016-E19 ou PS5016-E19T ( | — | — | Find on Amazon | |
| 6 | Patriot P300 128GB, 250GB, 500GB, 1TB | Value | Silicon Motion SMI 2263XT / Phison | 2100 | 320 | Check price on Amazon |
| 7 | TeamGroup MP33 128GB, 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB | Value | Silicon Motion SM2263XT | Phison P | 1800 | 1000 | Check price on Amazon |
| 8 | ADATA XPG SX6000 PRO 250GB, 500GB, 1TB | Value | Realtek’s RTS5763DL | 2100 | 600 | Find on Amazon |
| 9 | ADATA XPG GAMMIX S5 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB | Value | Realtek’s RTS5763DL | 2100 | 1200 | Find on Amazon |
| 10 | Asgard AN2 M.2 PCI-E 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB | Value | Silicon Motion SM2263XT (2-Core, 4 | 2100 | — | Find on Amazon |
| 11 | Lexar ® NM610 250GB, 500GB, 1TB | Value | Silicon Motion's SM2263XT (2-Core, | 2100 | 500 | Find on Amazon |
| 12 | Goodram PX500 250GB, 500GB, 1TB | Value | Silicon Motion SM2263XT (2-Core, 4 | 2050 | — | Find on Amazon |
| 13 | Biostar M700 250GB, 500GB, 1TB | Value | Silicon Motion's SM2263XT (2-Core, | 2000 | — | Find on Amazon |
| 14 | ADATA XPG SX6000 Lite 128GB, 250GB, 500GB, 1TB | Value | Realtek’s RTS5763DL | 1800 | 480 | Find on Amazon |
| 15 | ADATA SWORDFISH 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB | Value | Realtek RTS5763DL (Dual Core, 8-Ch | 1800 | 960 | Find on Amazon |
| 16 | Transcend 110S 128GB, 250GB, 500GB, 1TB | Value | Silicon Motion SM2263XT (2-Core, 4 | 1700 | 400 | Find on Amazon |
| 17 | Gigabyte NVMe SSD 128GB, 250GB, 500GB, 1TB | Low-end | Phison's PS5008-E8T | 2500 | 1600 | Find on Amazon |
| 18 | TeamGroup MP32 128GB, 250GB, 500GB, 1TB | Low-end | Phison PS5008-E8 | 1550 | 800 | Find on Amazon |
| 19 | ADATA XPG SPECTRIX S20G 500GB, 1TB | — | — | 2500 | 600 | Find on Amazon |
| 20 | Toshiba BG4 128GB, 250GB, 500GB, 1TB | — | Controlador Toshiba(Proprietário) | 2300 | — | Find on Amazon |
The parts, explained
1TB is the mainstream single-drive capacity.
PCIe 3.0 x4 reaches about 3,500 MB/s — plenty for everyday use and gaming, and cheaper than Gen4.
TLC NAND is the mainstream choice — a solid balance of endurance, speed and cost.
DRAM-less drives use the Host Memory Buffer (HMB) instead — cheaper, and fine for everyday use and gaming, with a small penalty under heavy random writes.
Common questions
Is a DRAM-less 1TB SSD good enough?
For gaming and everyday use, yes — HMB covers those workloads well. If you run sustained heavy random writes (databases, VMs), a drive with a DRAM cache stays more consistent.